Definition
Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) is the set of additional checks a financial institution applies to customers, relationships or transactions that present higher money laundering or terrorist financing risk. It typically includes deeper verification of source of funds and wealth, senior management approval, and more frequent, intensive monitoring than standard customer due diligence.
How it works
EDD is triggered when risk factors push a customer or transaction above the institution's standard risk tolerance. Common triggers include politically exposed persons, links to high-risk jurisdictions, complex ownership structures, unusually large or complex transactions, and correspondent relationships. Measures usually include obtaining and corroborating source-of-funds and source-of-wealth information, understanding the rationale for unusual transactions, obtaining senior management sign-off, and tightening monitoring thresholds.
Requirements by jurisdiction
US: Specific EDD obligations apply to certain foreign correspondent accounts (31 CFR 1010.610) and private banking accounts for non-US persons, including enhanced scrutiny of senior foreign political figures (31 CFR 1010.620). Beyond these, the CDD Rule expects due diligence to be commensurate with the customer's risk profile.
EU: AMLR Article 34 sets out general EDD measures, with specific rules for high-risk third countries, PEPs and cross-border correspondent relationships, applicable from 10 July 2027. It also names personalized asset management for customers holding at least €50 million in assets as a higher-risk case.
UK: Regulation 33 of the Money Laundering Regulations 2017 lists EDD triggers. From 30 June 2026, SI 2026/621 narrowed the transaction trigger to transactions that are "unusually complex or unusually large" given their nature, and replaced "high-risk third country" with "FATF call for action country" in the geographic trigger.
Common challenges
EDD is labor-intensive and often inconsistent across analysts. Source-of-wealth evidence is hard to corroborate, and firms risk over-applying EDD to entire customer categories rather than assessing individual risk, a practice regulators have criticized, for example in the UK's review of PEP treatment.
How teams handle it in practice
Teams define clear EDD triggers in their risk methodology, use structured questionnaires and evidence checklists, and require documented approval by a senior manager. Reviews are scheduled more frequently, and monitoring rules are tuned more tightly for EDD customers. Compliance platforms like Corsa can assemble EDD evidence packs and route them for approval.
How Corsa helps:
Dynamic Risk Assessment →
Frequently asked questions
When is EDD required?
When a customer or transaction presents higher risk, and in specific cases set by law, such as foreign PEPs, certain correspondent relationships and links to high-risk jurisdictions.
Is EDD the same in the US, EU and UK?
No. The US prescribes EDD mainly for correspondent and private banking accounts and otherwise relies on risk-based CDD, while the EU AMLR and UK MLR list broader mandatory EDD triggers.
What changed in UK EDD rules in 2026?
SI 2026/621, in force from 30 June 2026, refined the large or complex transaction trigger and tied the geographic trigger to FATF call-for-action countries.
Sources
ecfr.gov/current/title-31/subtitle-B/chapter-X/part-1010/subpart-F/section-1010.610
ecfr.gov/current/title-31/subtitle-B/chapter-X/part-1010/subpart-F/section-1010.620
fincen.gov/resources/statutes-and-regulations/cdd-final-rule
eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1624/oj/eng
legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2017/692/contents